home syndication

The Controversy of Chiropractic Medicine

The American Medical Association and board certified M.Ds blog regularly in Spinal Alchemy, which prefer to see results using what they call evidence-based medicine, felt that chiropractic was too esoteric and verging on quackery. Perhaps it is due to the D.D. Palmers dogged adherence to an almost religious belief system that the field of chiropractic was shunned and scoffed at by mainstream medicine.

As such in the past, the AMA has stood directly opposed to the employ of chiropractics as they felt it had no scientific basis or proof that it was beneficial.

While your chiropractor may not have personal knowledge or conditioning in some of these non invasive healing proficiencies, many have a team of massage therapists and acupuncturists on site. You can ask your appointed chiropractor what he or she offers.

The chiropractic discipline has had a persecuted past which continues to this day to a certain degree.

It seems that even though chiropractors patients were receiving relief with their spinal treatments, because it could not be documented through clinical testing, the AMA disapproved of it. It was and still is shunned within the mainstream medical community.

Still, students and practitioners of chiropractic will stand firm against their opposition that spinal modifications are a non-invasive form of healing which their patients gladly submit to.

Socialize This! These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • OnlyWire
  • Socialize-It
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Netscape
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Ma.gnolia
  • RawSugar

Comments are closed.